Live data report
Peptide Testing Transparency Report
A live, reproducible rollup of the purity, label-claim, method, and screening fields in every batch record published by Simms Research.
Counts and calculations update from the same published batch fields used by the COA library. Missing values remain missing: they are excluded from averages and are never converted into zeros or passing results.
Dataset snapshot
What is currently published
- Compound datasets
- 21 Products with at least one public batch record
- Batch records
- 50 All published batches in the dataset
- Purity records
- 50 Batches with a parseable reported percentage
- Average reported purity
- 99.66% Arithmetic mean across those 50 records
- Reported purity range
- 99.13%–99.97% Minimum to maximum; not a specification
- Comparable label claims
- 49 Records with measured and labeled values in compatible units
Method coverage
Methods named in batch records
A named method indicates what the source record reports; it is not, by itself, an independent assessment of method validation or suitability.
| Reported method | Batch records | Share of all published batches |
|---|---|---|
| HPLC-UV | 21 | 42.0% |
| RP-HPLC / LC-MS | 19 | 38.0% |
| HPLC | 9 | 18.0% |
| HPLC-Uv | 1 | 2.0% |
Screening coverage
Availability is not assumed
Coverage counts only records with an explicit value. “Clear” counts results normalized as pass, passed, negative, no growth, not detected, or none detected.
Endotoxin field
70.0%35 of 50 batch records contain a result; 35 of those are reported clear.
Heavy-metals field
38.0%19 of 50 batch records contain a result; 19 of those are reported clear.
Microbial sterility field
38.0%19 of 50 batch records contain a result; 19 of those are reported clear.
Label-claim comparison
Measured versus labeled content
Only records with parseable values in compatible units enter this calculation. Positive means the measured value is above the label claim; negative means below.
These are descriptive statistics, not acceptance criteria. Interpreting conformance requires a predefined specification, sampling plan, and fit-for-purpose quantitative method.
Source directory
Results by compound
Open a row’s dataset to inspect every value and source certificate included in that compound’s history.
| Compound | Batches | Average purity | Latest method | Latest dated test | Dataset |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BPC-157 | 5 | 99.40% | RP-HPLC / LC-MS | Jul 16, 2026 | View batches → |
| CJC-1295 noDAC / IPAMORELIN | 1 | 99.93% | HPLC-UV | May 5, 2026 | View batches → |
| DSIP | 2 | 99.74% | RP-HPLC / LC-MS | Jul 16, 2026 | View batches → |
| EPITHALON | 2 | 99.78% | RP-HPLC / LC-MS | Jul 16, 2026 | View batches → |
| GHK-CU | 4 | 99.81% | RP-HPLC / LC-MS | Jul 16, 2026 | View batches → |
| GLOW | 2 | 99.43% | HPLC-UV | Apr 14, 2026 | View batches → |
| GLP-2 (TZ) | 2 | 99.84% | RP-HPLC / LC-MS | Jul 16, 2026 | View batches → |
| GLP-3 (RT) | 6 | 99.78% | RP-HPLC / LC-MS | Jul 16, 2026 | View batches → |
| GLUTATHIONE | 2 | 99.71% | RP-HPLC / LC-MS | Jul 16, 2026 | View batches → |
| IPAMORELIN | 2 | 99.84% | RP-HPLC / LC-MS | Jul 16, 2026 | View batches → |
| KLOW | 2 | 99.69% | RP-HPLC / LC-MS | Jul 17, 2026 | View batches → |
| KPV | 2 | 99.57% | RP-HPLC / LC-MS | Jul 16, 2026 | View batches → |
| MELANOTAN I | 2 | 99.52% | RP-HPLC / LC-MS | Jul 16, 2026 | View batches → |
| MELANOTAN II | 2 | 99.48% | RP-HPLC / LC-MS | Jul 16, 2026 | View batches → |
| MOTS-C | 2 | 99.84% | RP-HPLC / LC-MS | Jul 16, 2026 | View batches → |
| NAD+ | 2 | 99.66% | RP-HPLC / LC-MS | Jul 16, 2026 | View batches → |
| SELANK | 2 | 99.46% | RP-HPLC / LC-MS | Jul 16, 2026 | View batches → |
| SEMAX | 2 | 99.57% | RP-HPLC / LC-MS | Jul 16, 2026 | View batches → |
| SERMORELIN | 2 | 99.74% | RP-HPLC / LC-MS | Jul 16, 2026 | View batches → |
| TESAMORELIN | 2 | 99.76% | RP-HPLC / LC-MS | Jul 16, 2026 | View batches → |
| THYMOSIN ALPHA-1 | 2 | 99.45% | RP-HPLC / LC-MS | Jul 16, 2026 | View batches → |
Reproducibility
Calculation notes
- The universe is every published batch attached to a live, visible, priced product in the COA library.
- Purity statistics include only values that parse as percentages from 0 through 100.
- Label variance uses (measured − labeled) ÷ labeled × 100 after converting compatible mass units to milligrams.
- Missing, blank, “not tested,” and unavailable screening fields do not enter the clear-result count.
- Dates come from the published test-date field; the report does not infer dates from upload timestamps.
- Every compound total links to the underlying rows and source documents so readers can audit the rollup.
Because the report reflects the currently published catalog, totals may change as new batches are added or products leave the live catalog. Historical snapshots should record an access date.
This report summarizes supplier-published analytical records for laboratory research materials. It does not independently reanalyze the samples, establish clinical quality or safety, or imply suitability for human or veterinary use.